Bitcoin’s Growing Carbon Footprint May Crush its Potential

The international cryptocurrency market is already on a roll recently, surpassing $2 trillion (£1.4 trillion) for the very first time in April 2021. However, one of its most prominent supporters, computer pioneer Elon Musk, halted its growth this week when he revealed that Tesla would no longer accept Bitcoin as payment for its electric vehicles.

The decision (advertised on Twitter) is projected to have cost the market $365 billion (£259 billion). Cryptocurrencies are electronic or digital currencies using decentralized blockchain technology infrastructure, such as Bitcoin. They are now gaining traction as a potential countermeasure to the possibility of post-pandemic inflation.

Simultaneously, the debate over its rapidly growing demand for energy, carbon emissions, as well as environmental impact has resurfaced. Bitcoin trading is very popular these days. So, this is the time to become a better trader. Bitcoin will help you become a better trader as experienced traders most recommend it.

Carbon Footprint Underestimated By Bitcoin Miners

Although Bitcoin supporters have long underestimated the rising carbon footprint, it is becoming increasingly difficult to disregard. The “proof-of-work” mining – machines solving complex mathematical problems – developed to protect transactions is an integral mechanism needing vast quantities of resources, resulting in a rapidly increasing carbon effect that already rivals that of small countries.

The computing effort needed for mining grows through nature as machines get quicker and more people fight for mining rewards. This raises the prospect that Bitcoin’s energy demand will continue to rise, especially if Bitcoin transaction costs and hash rates rise as expected.

Energy Consumption Could Continue To Rise

The computing effort needed for mining grows through nature as machines get quicker and more people fight for mining rewards. This implies that Bitcoin’s energy usage would continue to rise, particularly if Bitcoin transaction costs and hash rates – their cumulative computing capacity – rise as expected. In addition to the need for electricity and computing capacity, and excellent bitcoin mining, these rigs are outfitted with advanced processors with content and metal specifications.

When they die, they generate a pile of waste, and technological waste becomes the world’s fastest-growing waste source. Furthermore, the supply chain for specialized Bitcoin mining equipment is dominated by a small number of firms. Manufacturers such as Bitmain can face extra taxation, similar to cigarette firms, or may be denied access to chip manufacturing.

There’ve been arguments, even until recently by people, namely Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk, suggesting Bitcoin should use excess solar electricity to incentivize renewable energy production and delivery, but this reasoning is faulty. There is currently a lot of demand for all this otherwise wasted electricity, whether used to produce renewable hydrogen or recharge the increasing fleets of electric vehicles, and smarter grids make it simpler to prevent seeing some captured energy go to waste.

Bitcoin itself carries an intrinsic danger. With too much mining capacity concentrated in a single country, the global network and its consumers are exposed to a high level of political danger – ironic that Bitcoin was conceived deliberately as a decentralized digital asset with no single group or jurisdiction in charge.

Investors Are Expected To Be Hesitant

Bitcoin is constantly at odds with the demand to produce renewable, prosperous economies. Not only would this justify policymakers to shut down Bitcoin mining, but ethical customers and developers are likely to avoid utilizing or engaging in such a wasteful technology, and it was possible such pressure prompted Elon Musk’s Tesla to withdraw from embracing Bitcoin.

Other cryptocurrencies, such as Ether that utilize Ethereum just like its blockchain, actively preparing to move back from proof-of-work and toward alternate authentication methods such as proof-of-stake. In contrast, all new cryptos are likely to be designed with environmental considerations and scalability in mind from the outset.

Final Thoughts

Despite the libertarian origins of cryptocurrency, institutions like Wall Street are starting to investigate central bank digital currency, which could be quite consumer-friendly and thus safer assets due to clear government backing. There is no denying that cryptocurrency and blockchains, in some way or another, are here to remain, even though Bitcoin, as well as proof-of-work, are not.

However, international collaboration and concerted policy response to digital currencies would become extremely relevant, undermining the idea that cryptocurrencies should be free of clear governance and government control.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button