Baking Pan Size Converter
Swap one pan for another by area and volume, and know what it does to the bake.
Updated
About 1 in for a single cake layer. This is what drives the bake.
Pan swap
1.006×area
63.62 in² to 64.00 in²
- Volume ratio, brim full
- 1.006×
- Capacity, new pan
- 8.7 cups
- Batter volume
- 4.34 cups
- New batter depth
- 0.99 in
- Fills the new pan to
- 50%
- Scale the recipe by
- 1.01× to keep the depth
The batter sits thinner than the recipe intended, so it will bake faster and drier. Start checking well before the printed time and judge it by a skewer rather than the clock. Anything inside about ten percent of area is a straight swap with no change at all.
In short
How do you convert between baking pan sizes?
Compare the areas. A round pan is pi times the radius squared, so a 9 inch round is 63.62 square inches, within 0.6 percent of an 8 inch square at 64. A 9 by 13 inch pan is 117 square inches, 1.84 times the 9 inch round, so the same batter sits 0.54 inches deep instead of 1 inch and bakes faster and drier.
Area is the right comparison for a shallow bake such as a cake or a brownie. For a deep bake, compare the volume the pan can actually hold.
How to use the baking pan size converter
Choose the shape and size of the pan the recipe names, then the shape and size of the pan you have. The tool computes both areas, divides one by the other, and gives you the ratio that decides whether the swap works. Round pans use pi times the radius squared; square and rectangular pans are plain multiplication.
The default comparison is the swap people search for most: a 9 inch round against an 8 inch square. Their areas are 63.62 and 64 square inches, a difference of 0.6 percent, which is well inside the accuracy of the pans themselves. That is a straight substitution with no change to the recipe and barely any to the time.
63.62 in²
A 9 inch round
pi times 4.5 squared
64 in²
An 8 inch square
0.6 percent larger
117 in²
A 9 by 13 inch pan
1.84 times the 9 inch round
Give both pans a wall height and the tool also reports the volume ratio, which is the comparison a deep bake needs, plus each pan brim-full capacity in cups. Set how deep the batter sits in the original pan and it carries that same batter across and tells you the depth it lands at in the new one.
That depth figure is the point of the whole tool. Move a one inch layer from a 9 inch round into a 9 by 13 and it thins to 0.54 inches. Move it the other way, from a 9 by 13 into an 8 inch square, and it deepens to 1.83 inches, which fills a two inch pan to 91 percent before the batter has risen at all.
Where the areas do not match, you have two honest options. Keep the recipe and accept a different depth, adjusting the time and watching closely, or scale the recipe by the area ratio so the depth stays where the recipe intended. The second is the safer route for anything leavened.
A thinner bake usually wants a hotter start
Once the depth changes, the temperature is the other lever. The oven converter covers conventional against fan and the offset each convention uses.
Open the oven temperature converter →Two limits worth stating. The tool measures the pan you describe, not the pan you own, and pan dimensions are nominal. It also says nothing about a precise new bake time, because no honest formula exists for one, only the direction of travel and the advice to check early.
The common US baking pans with their usual metric equivalents, the floor area each one actually gives you, and how much a 2 inch deep pan of that size holds brim-full. Compare pans by the area column, not by the name, since a 9 inch round and an 8 inch square differ by 0.6 percent while their labels look nothing alike.
| Pan | Metric size, as sold | Area, square inches | Area, square centimetres | Holds at 2 in deep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 in round | 15 cm round | 28.27 | 182 | 3.86 cups |
| 8 in round | 20 cm round | 50.27 | 324 | 6.86 cups |
| 9 in round | 23 cm round | 63.62 | 410 | 8.69 cups |
| 10 in round | 25 cm round | 78.54 | 507 | 10.73 cups |
| 8 in square | 20 by 20 cm | 64.00 | 413 | 8.74 cups |
| 9 in square | 23 by 23 cm | 81.00 | 523 | 11.06 cups |
| 11 by 7 in | 28 by 18 cm | 77.00 | 497 | 10.52 cups |
| 9 by 13 in | 33 by 23 cm | 117.00 | 755 | 15.98 cups |
| 10 by 15 in jelly roll | 25 by 38 cm | 150.00 | 968 | 20.48 cups |
| 12 by 17 in half sheet | 30 by 43 cm | 204.00 | 1,316 | 27.86 cups |
| 8.5 by 4.5 in loaf | 22 by 11 cm | 38.25 | 247 | 5.22 cups |
| 9 by 5 in loaf | 23 by 13 cm | 45.00 | 290 | 6.15 cups |
Substitute by area or by volume?
Both ratios are on screen and they answer different questions. Pick the wrong one and the swap that looked fine on paper overflows the pan or bakes into a biscuit. The rule is short: a shallow bake substitutes by area, a deep bake substitutes by volume.
Shallow bakes go by area
Cakes, brownies, blondies, sheet cakes, bar cookies and tray bakes all sit in a thin layer with plenty of pan wall above them. Nothing about the pan height is doing any work, so only the floor area matters, and matching area keeps the depth, and therefore the bake, unchanged.
Deep bakes go by volume
Casseroles, deep-dish bakes, bread pudding, tall layer cakes and anything that comes close to filling its pan are limited by capacity rather than floor space. Here the wall height is load-bearing, and a pan with the same area but shallower walls simply will not hold the food.
- 9 in round to 8 in square
- area ×1.006, a straight swap
- 8 in square to 9 by 13
- area ×1.83, batter far thinner
- 9 by 13 to 8 in square
- area ×0.55, batter 1.83 in deep
- 8 in round to 9 in round
- area ×1.27, a whole size step
- 9 by 13 to two 9 in rounds
- area ×1.09, close enough to split
Two 9 inch rounds come to 127.24 square inches against the 9 by 13 pan 117, so splitting a sheet cake into two layers spreads the batter about 9 percent thinner.
The last row is the most useful trick in the list. When no single pan matches, two smaller ones often do, and splitting keeps the depth right rather than compromising it. Two 9 inch rounds stand in for a 9 by 13 with about 9 percent more area between them, which is a small and forgiving error.
Do
- Match floor area for cakes, brownies and anything that bakes in a thin layer.
- Match capacity for casseroles, deep-dish bakes and anything that nearly fills its pan.
- Split the batter between two smaller pans when no single pan matches the area.
- Measure your own pans across the top from inside edge to inside edge before trusting a label.
- Start checking the bake well before the printed time whenever the depth has changed.
Don't
- Assume a 10 inch round is a little bigger than a 9 inch, since it holds 23 percent more.
- Pour a recipe into a pan whose walls are shorter than the batter will rise.
- Read a pan swap off the printed size alone, because area moves with the square of the width.
- Expect the same crust and edges from a much thinner layer of the same batter.
- Keep the printed time when the batter depth has visibly changed.
Why two 9 inch pans are not the same pan
Pan sizes are nominal, meaning the number on the label is a name rather than a measurement. Bakeware is measured across the top, from inside edge to inside edge, and pans with sloped sides hold noticeably less than that figure implies once you get down to the base.
That is before manufacturing tolerance, wall thickness and rolled rims come into it. Two pans both sold as 9 inch rounds can differ by a good fraction of an inch inside, and since area moves with the square of the width, a small difference in diameter is a larger difference in the surface your batter has to spread across.
- Measure across the top, inside edge to inside edge, not across the outer rim.
- Measure the wall height on the inside too, from the base up.
- Check the base as well when the sides slope, since that is the real bottom area.
- Write the true dimensions on a label under the pan and stop remeasuring.
Metric equivalents carry the same looseness. The inch is exactly 25.4 millimetres under the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement, so a 9 inch pan is 22.86 centimetres, but nobody sells a 22.86 centimetre tin. It is sold as 23 centimetres, and a 20 centimetre tin stands in for the 8 inch, which is 20.32.
The formula, worked line by line
Everything here comes from two areas and a division. A round pan is pi times the radius squared, and the radius is half the diameter printed on the label. A square pan is its side squared, and a rectangular pan is its two sides multiplied. Divide the new area by the old and you have the ratio that governs the swap.
Capacity adds one dimension: area times wall height. Batter depth runs the same calculation backwards. The volume of batter is fixed by the recipe, so pouring it into a different pan divides that fixed volume by a different area, and the depth changes in exact inverse proportion.
round area = π × (diameter ÷ 2)²
square area = side² rectangular area = length × width
area ratio = new area ÷ old area
capacity = area × wall height
new batter depth = old batter depth ÷ area ratio
9 in round: π × 4.5² = 63.62 in² 8 in square: 8² = 64 in²- Original pan area
- π × 4.5² = 63.62 in²
- New pan area
- 13 × 9 = 117 in²
- Area ratio
- 117 ÷ 63.62 = 1.84
- Batter at 1 in deep
- 63.62 × 1 = 63.62 in³, or 4.34 cups
- New batter depth
- 0.54 in
The same batter, spread across nearly twice the floor, sits a little over half as deep. It will set sooner, brown more of its surface, and dry out if it stays in for the time the original recipe printed.
Run that in reverse and the danger changes sides. A 9 by 13 recipe poured into an 8 inch square has 0.55 times the area, so a 1 inch layer becomes 1.83 inches, filling a 2 inch pan to 91 percent before any rise. Batter that climbs during the bake will go over the rim.
What this tool deliberately will not tell you
Glass and dark metal pull the same result further apart again. Dark surfaces absorb more radiant heat and brown the edges faster, and glass holds heat once it has it, so both tend to run ahead of a shiny light pan even at an identical depth. That is one more reason the doneness test outranks the printed time.
Questions people ask
Can I use a 9 inch round pan instead of an 8 inch square?
Yes, and it is one of the safest swaps in baking. A 9 inch round is pi times 4.5 squared, or 63.62 square inches, while an 8 inch square is 64. The gap is 0.6 percent, which is smaller than the variation between two pans of the same nominal size, so the batter sits at practically the same depth and bakes in practically the same time. Change nothing about the recipe. The swap that does not work is a 9 inch round for a 9 inch square, since the square is 81 square inches, 27 percent larger.
How do I convert a recipe to a 9 by 13 inch pan?
Work from the area. A 9 by 13 pan is 117 square inches, so it is 1.84 times a 9 inch round at 63.62, and 1.83 times an 8 inch square at 64. If you keep the recipe as written, the batter spreads to a little over half its original depth, roughly 0.54 inches from a 1 inch layer, and will bake faster and drier. If you want the original texture, scale the recipe by the area ratio so the depth stays where it was. Two 9 inch rounds, at 127.24 square inches together, are also a close stand-in.
Should I match pans by area or by volume?
By area for a shallow bake and by volume for a deep one. Cakes, brownies, bar cookies and sheet cakes sit in a thin layer with plenty of wall above them, so only the floor area is doing any work and matching it keeps the depth and the bake unchanged. Casseroles, deep dish bakes and anything that nearly fills its pan are limited by capacity instead, and a pan with the right area but shorter walls will not hold the food. This tool reports both ratios so you can choose the one your recipe needs.
How much longer should I bake in a smaller, deeper pan?
There is no reliable formula, and any source that gives you one has invented it. Bake time depends on the batter depth, the pan material and colour, and whether the oven runs a fan. What is dependable is the direction: a deeper layer takes longer in the centre while the edges keep cooking, so lower the temperature slightly to give the middle time, extend the bake, and check with a skewer rather than the clock. A thinner layer runs the other way and can be done well before the printed time.
Why do two pans of the same size hold different amounts?
Because pan sizes are nominal. The number on the label is a name, and bakeware is measured across the top from inside edge to inside edge, so a pan with sloped sides holds less than the figure suggests once you reach the base. Add manufacturing tolerance, wall thickness and rolled rims and two pans both sold as 9 inch rounds can differ by a real fraction of an inch inside. Since area grows with the square of the width, a small difference in diameter becomes a larger difference in the area your batter spreads over. Measure your own pans once and label them.
Sources
Where the constants and formulas on this page come from. Each line names the figure it backs.
The exactly defined inch behind every pan dimension converted here.
SI Units — Length — NIST Office of Weights and Measures
The 240 mL cup, 15 mL tablespoon and 5 mL teaspoon used when a recipe volume is scaled with the pan.
21 CFR 101.9(b)(5)(viii), Nutrition labeling of food — US Government Publishing Office
Shop baking pans on Amazon
Browse current options and prices directly on Amazon — we don’t list products here.
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Related guides
Cooking
Laphing 101: Everything You Need to Know About This Tibetan Delicacy
Laphing is Tibet's spicy cold-noodle street food — slippery mung-bean jelly noodles in fiery chili sauce. Learn its origins, how it's made, and how to make it at home.
August 14, 2026 · 17 min read
Cooking
How Many Grams in a Cup? Every Ingredient, One Chart
One formula, fourteen densities. Why flour is 120 g, honey is 340 g, and the ingredient — not the cup — decides the number.
August 10, 2026 · 14 min read
Math
How to Add Fractions With Different Denominators — and Why the Rule Works
1/2 + 1/3 done the wrong way gives 2/5 — smaller than the 1/2 you started with. A sum must beat both addends, and that check is free.
August 16, 2026 · 10 min read